Instrumentalising Indigenous Differences: Modernity’s Ultimate Cul-de-Sac
PDF

Keywords

indifference
social anthropology
indigenous peoples
Hegel
dialectic development

How to Cite

Instrumentalising Indigenous Differences: Modernity’s Ultimate Cul-de-Sac. (2026). Alternautas. https://doi.org/10.31273/eg6ypg85

Abstract

This is a critical examination of the contemporary comprehension of difference, focusing particularly on one of its most violent expressions: the systematic and often brutal instrumentalisation of Indigenous peoples in the wake of mainstream development and the ongoing encroachment upon Indigenous worlds, especially across the American continent. It argues that difference is not an incidental feature of social life but a central mediator of both internal and external relations, shaping how groups respond to one another and how new forms of interaction and conflict emerge. Throughout recent centuries, divergent and frequently antagonistic interpretations of difference – rooted in contrasting ideological and political projects – have collided, revealing the persistent struggle over whose worldview prevails in defining social order. This process unfolds through complex socio‑spatial dynamics in which conservative forces have consistently worked to relativise, domesticate, or negate autonomous forms of difference. In doing so, they reinforce entrenched hierarchies and sustain a status quo marked by structural intolerance and deep inequality. Difference does not merely exist within space; it is produced through spatial relations. Its political significance becomes fully intelligible only when examined through the collective and contested production of social space, where groups negotiate, resist and reshape the conditions under which they live. Ultimately, the management, suppression or mobilisation of difference plays a decisive role in structuring contemporary socio‑spatial orders, determining who is recognised, who is marginalised and whose worlds are allowed to flourish or are rendered disposable.

PDF

References

Alfred, T. and Corntassel, J., 2005. ‘Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism.’ Government and Opposition, 40(4), pp. 597–614.

Andersen, C., 2009. ‘Critical Indigenous Studies: From difference to density.’ Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), pp. 80–100.

Byrd, J.A., 2011. The Transit of Empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Chandler, D. and Reid, J., 2020. ‘Becoming Indigenous: the “speculative turn” in anthropology and the (re)colonisation of indigeneity.’ Postcolonial Studies, 23(4), pp. 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2020.1745993

de la Cadena, M. and Starn, O., eds., 2007. Indigenous Experience Today. Oxford and New York: Berg.

Derrida, J., 2016. Of Grammatology. Transl. G.C. Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Durán Matute, I., 2021. ‘Indigeneity as a transnational battlefield: Disputes over meanings, spaces and peoples.’ Globalizations, 18(2), pp. 256–272.

Escobar, A., 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Estes, N., Yazzie, M.K., Denetdale, J.N. and Correia, D., 2021. Red Nations Rising: From bordertown violence to Native liberation. Oakland: PM Press.

Fleming, P., 2025. Capitalism and Nothingness: Critical theory of unwanted times. London: Bloomsbury.

Hall, S., 1990. ‘Cultural identity and diaspora.’ In: J. Rutherford, ed., Identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 222–237.

Harris, C., 2002. Making Native Space: Colonialism, resistance and reserves in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Hegel, G.W.F., 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Transl. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2019. ‘Political agency of indigenous peoples: The Guarani-Kaiowa’s fight for survival and recognition.’ Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 16, e16207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412019v16a207

Ioris, A.A.R., 2020. ‘Ontological politics and the struggle for the Guarani-Kaiowa world.’ Space and Polity, 24(3), pp. 382–400.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2021. Kaiowcide: Living through the Guarani-Kaiowa genocide. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2022. ‘Indigenous peoples, land-based disputes and strategies of socio-spatial resistance at agricultural frontiers.’ Ethnopolitics, 21(3), pp. 278–298.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2023. ‘Indigeneity and Indigenous politics: Ground-breaking resources.’ Revista de Estudios Sociales, 85, pp. 3–21.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2024a. ‘Uncommon world production: In search of freedom and recognition.’ Societies, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120274

Ioris, A.A.R., 2024b. Geographies of Difference, Indifference and Mis-difference: The Guarani-Kaiowa people and the myths of Brazilian development. London: Bloomsbury.

Ioris, A.A.R., 2025. Uncommoning, Difference and Politics: Worldless production of Paraguay. London and New York: Routledge.

Kopenawa, D. and Albert, B., 2013. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami shaman. Transl. N. Elliott and A. Dundy. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Krenak, A., 2019. Ideias para Adiar o Fim do Mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Mackinnon, C., 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Malabou, C., 2004. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, temporality and dialectic. Transl. L. During. London: Routledge.

Marcuse, H., 1991 . One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London and New York: Routledge.

McCormack, F., 2012. ‘Indigeneity as process: Māori claims and neoliberalism.’ Social Identities, 18(4), pp. 417–434.

McGowan, T., 2019. Emancipation after Hegel: Achieving a contradictory revolution. New York: Columbia University Press.

Monteiro, J.N., 2022. Negros da Terra: Índios e bandeirantes nas origens de São Paulo. 2nd edn. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Moreton-Robinson, A., 2015. The White Possessive: Property, power, and Indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Normann, S., 2021. ‘Re-living a common future in the face of ecological disaster: Exploring (elements of) Guarani and Kaiowá collective memories, political imagination, and critiques.’ Human Arenas, 5(4), pp. 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00188-0

Ollman, B., 1976. Alienation: Marx’s conception of man in capitalist society. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Radcliffe, S., 2020. ‘Geography and indigeneity III: Co-articulation of colonialism and capitalism in indigeneity’s economies.’ Progress in Human Geography, 44(2), pp. 374–388.

Saldaña-Portillo, M.J., 2016. Indian Given: Racial geographies across Mexico and the United States. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Shaw, K., 2008. Indigeneity and Political Theory: Sovereignty and the limits of the political. London and New York: Routledge.

Spivak, G.C., 1994. ‘Can the subaltern speak?’ In: P. Williams and L. Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 66–111.

Stavenhagen, R., 1975. Social Classes in Agrarian Societies. New York: Anchor Press.

Taylor, C., 1997. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thoreau, H.D., 2016. Walden. London: Penguin.

Wolfe, P., 2006. ‘Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native.’ Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), pp. 387–409.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Antonio Augusto Rossotto Ioris

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.