Modelling Social Mobilisation – An interdisciplinary exploration of Twitter as a mediating tool for social acts and information networks
In recent years, researchers, social commentators and the mass media have turned their attention to shifts in the use of social media for political and social action. This article provides an overview of the recent discussions focusing on how Twitter specifically functions as a mediating tool for social acts. We present findings from a recent pilot project exploring the mechanics of disseminating information via Twitter across a dynamic human network in order to contribute to an understanding of how people use social media to share information and prompt others into action, and outline some approaches for performing this analysis. Taking the perspective of communities of users operating in hybrid spaces, we make recommendations for further research in this field.
Key words: Twitter, hybrid spaces, social networks, social acts, information flow
Ahlqvist, T., Bäck, A., Halonen, M. & Heinonen, S. (2008) Social Media Roadmaps: Exploring the futures triggered by social media, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Accessed online 30/4/2013 at http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2008/T2454.pdf?q=sociable-media
Ahn, Y., Bagrow, J., and Lehmann, S. (2010) Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466 (05 August 2010), pp.761-764
Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
Baym, N (2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell
Cattuto C, Loreto V, Pietronero L (2007) Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jan 30;104(5):1461-4. Epub 2007 Jan 23
Charles, A. (2012) Interactivity: New media, politics and society, Oxford: Peter Lang
Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Lan, X., and Suri, S. (2010) Sequential Influence Models in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010, ICWSM 2010, Washington, DC, USA, May 23-26, 2010, The AAAI Press.
de Souza e Silva, A. & Delacruz, G. (2006) Hybrid Reality Games Reframed: Potential Uses in Educational Contexts, Games and Culture 1(3) pp. 231-251.
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Cambridge: CUP
Eckmann, J-P. & Moses, E. (2002) Curvature of co-links uncovers hidden thematic layers in the world wide web. PNAS, 99(9):5825–5829, April 2002.
Gillen, J. & Merchant, G. (2013) Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic, social, and linguistic practice, Language Sciences, Vol 35, pp.47-58
Herwig, J. (2009) Liminality and Communitas in Social Media: The Case of Twitter. Accessed 28/2/13 at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/jana.herwig/PDF/herwig_ir10_liminalitycommunitastwitter_v5oct09.pdf
Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays by Martin Heidegger, London: Harper & Row Publishers
Jurgenson, N. (2011) When Atoms Meet Bits: Social Media, the Mobile Web and Augmented Revolution, Future Internet, 4(1), 83-91
Kluitenberg, E. (2006) The Network of Wave: Living and Acting in a Hybrid Space, Open Vol. 11, SKOR – Foundation for Art and Public Domain. Accessed online at http://classic.skor.nl/2883/en/contents-open-11-hybrid-space, 28/2/13
Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., & Moore, J. (2011) Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the OMG, in Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved March 31, 2013, fromwww.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2857/3251
Lambiotte, R., Saramaki, J., and Blondel, V.D. (2009) Dynamics of latent voters. Physical Review E, 79(4):046107, 6 pages.
Manovich, L. Lev (2002) The Poetics of Augmented Space: Learning from Prada), Accessed online 31/3/13 http://www.manovich.net/articles.php
Minsky, M. (1980) Telepresence, Omni, June 1980
Murthy, D. (2013) Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter Age, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
Romero, D., Meeder, B., Kleinberg, J. (2011) Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter, Proceedings of WWW’11 – the 20th international conference on World Wide Web, pp695-704 Accessed 31/3/13 at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/www11-hashtags.pdf
Sturken, M. & Thomas, D. (2004) Introduction: technological visions and the rhetoric of the new. In M. Sturken, D. Thomas & S. Ball-Rokeach (eds.) Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears that Shape New Technologies, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E. (2010) Want to be Retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting Retweet in Titter Network, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (Social Com), pp177-184
Tang, J.. Musolesi, M., Mascolo, C., Latora, V. ; Nicosia, V., (2010) Analysing Information Flows and Key Mediators through Temporal Centrality Metrics, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Systems (SNS'10), ACM Press - Association for Computing Machinery, pp1-6
Wellman and Berkowitz (eds.) (1988) Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Zhao, H., Lin, W., Liu, K. (2011) Behavior Dynamics in Media-Sharing Social Networks, Cambridge: CUP
Copyright (c) 2014 Exchanges: the Warwick Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits use and redistribution of the work provided that the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is included, and an indication of changes which were made. Third-party users may not apply legal terms or technological measures to the published article which legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
If accepted for publication authors’ work will be made open access and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license unless previously agreed with Exchanges’ Editor-in-Chief prior to submission.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (see: The Effect of Open Access)