‘This is education as the practice of freedom': Twenty Years of Women’s Studies at the University of Oxford
On 23 May 2015 students on the Women’s Studies Masters (M.St course) at the University of Oxford organised a conference to commemorate twenty years of Women’s Studies at Oxford, entitled: ‘Teaching to Transgress’: Twenty Years of Women’s Studies at Oxford. The conference consisted of a mixture of papers from leading academics in the field of Women’s Studies, as well as from postgraduate students currently enrolled on the M.St programme at Oxford, with the intention of giving young early career women the opportunity to present their research to a broad interdisciplinary audience.Since its foundation in 1995, the Women’s Studies course has strived to enact what the American feminist and activist bell hooks terms ‘education as the practice of freedom’. Reflecting upon the discussions emerging from the conference, the conference organisers Charlotte De Val and Eleri Anona Watson ask: ‘what are the new and repeated challenges we face in fulfilling this practice of freedom?’ They also consider the changing scope of Women’s Studies as an academic field alongside present debates regarding its future in the UK and further afield. Examining debates of ‘possibility’ and ‘impossibility’ within Women’s Studies—that is to say, materialist versus post-structuralist critiques—in conjunction with questions of accessibility and ‘intellectual gatekeeping’, this article proposes that the future of Women's Studies is not the ‘apocalyptic’ vision that its critics would often have us believe. Indeed, one of the themes emerging from the conference was that as long as the field practices radical self-questioning and self-critique, Women’s Studies will maintain its academically and socially transformative potential.
 bell hooks’s writings cover gender, race, teaching, education and media, emphasising the connections with systems of oppression. hooks is the author of pioneering works such as Ain’t I a Woman?: Black Women and Feminism (1981), Feminist Theory: From Margin to Centre (1984) and Writing Beyond Race: Living Theory and Practice (2013), and remains a leading public intellectual in feminist and educational studies.
Brown, W. (1997), ‘The Impossibility of Women’s Studies’, differences, 9 (3), 79–101
Buker, E. (2003), ‘Is Women's Studies a Disciplinary or an Interdisciplinary Field of Inquiry?’ National Women’s Studies Association 15 (1), 73–93
Crenshaw, K. (1993), ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Colour’, in Alcoff, L. M. and Mendieta, E. (eds.), Identities: Race, Class, Gender, and Nationality, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing
Crosby, C. (1992), ‘Dealing with Differences’ in Butler, J. and Scott, J. W. (eds.), Feminists Theorize the Political, New York, NY: Routledge, 130–143
Hall, S. (1997), ‘Race, the Floating Signifier,’ Media Education Foundation http://www.mediaed.org/assets/products/407/transcript_407.pdf [accessed 14 September 2015]
hooks, b. (1984), Feminist Theory from Margin to Centre, Boston, MA: South End Press
--- (1994), Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York: Routledge
--- (2013), ‘Dig Deep: Beyond Lean In’, The Feminist Wire http://www.thefeministwire.com/2013/10/17973/7 [accessed 03 September 2015]
Johnson, B. (1989), A World of Difference, Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press
May, V. (2002), ‘Disciplinary Desires and Undisciplined Daughters: Negotiating the Politics of a Women’s Studies Doctoral Education’, National Women’s Studies Association, 14 (1), 134–159
McRobbie, A. (2008), The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture, and Social Change, London: SAGE
Modleski, T. (1991), Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age (Japanese Studies), London: Routledge
Rhoden-Paul, A. (2015) ‘Oxford Uni must decolonise its campus and curriculum, say students’, The Guardian, 18 June 2015
http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jun/18/oxford-uni-must-decolonise-its-campus-and-curriculum-say-students [accessed 10 October 2015]
Sandberg, S. (2013), Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead, London: WH Allen
Townsend, M. (2015), ‘Hundreds protest to demand closure of Yarl’s Wood immigration centre’, The Guardian, 6 June 2015 http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/06/hundreds-protest-at-yarls-wood-demand-closure [accessed 10 October 2015]
Wiegman, R. (2001), ‘Women’s Studies: Interdisciplinary imperatives, again,’ Feminist Studies, 27 (2), 514–518
--- (2005), ‘The possibility of Women’s Studies’ in Kennedy, E. and Beins, A. (eds.), Women's Studies for the Future: Foundations, Interrogations, Politics, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 40–60
Yee, S. (1997), ‘The ‘Women’ in Women’s Studies’, differences, 9 (3), 46–64
Zimmerman, B. (2005), ‘Beyond Dualisms: Some Thoughts about the Future of Women’s Studies’ in Kennedy, E. and Beins, A., Women's Studies for the Future: Foundations, Interrogations, Politics, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 31–39
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, providing it is not used for commercial purposes and any derivative work is shared with the same license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).