Science For All


  • Liam J. Messin University of Warwick
  • John C. Meadows University of Warwick
  • Liam J. Messin Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick,
  • John C. Meadows Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick and Institute of Advanced Study, University of Warwick



Open Science, Science Publishing, Open Access


Science is the best method humanity has for understanding the universe and our place in it. However, despite its astonishing achievements, the implementation and communication of science is not without problem. In this article the development of scientific publishing is discussed, as is its subsequent impact on scientific discovery and on the profession itself. The ways in which a move towards a more open science framework might alter how science is reported and ultimately performed is also addressed.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Liam J. Messin, University of Warwick

Liam Messin is a PhD candidate in the Division of Biomedical Sciences at Warwick Medical School funded by a Warwick University Chancellor's Scholarship and the Medical Research Council.

John C. Meadows, University of Warwick

John Meadows is an Institute of Advanced Study funded Global Research Fellow in the Biomedical Sciences Division of Warwick Medical School.


Attard, J., F. Orlandi, S. Scerri and S. Auer (2015), ‘A systematic review of open government data initiatives’, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 399–418

Bartling, S. and S. Friesike (eds) (2014), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer International Publishing

Barton, R. (1998), ‘Just before Nature: The purposes of science and the purposes of popularization in some English popular science journals of the 1860s’, Annals of Science, 55 (1), 1–33

Begley, C. G. and L. M. Ellis (2012), ‘Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical research’, Nature, 483, 531–533

Blatt M. R. (2015), ‘Vigilante Science’, Plant Physiology, 169, 907–909

Brown, R. (ed.) (1877), Science For All, London: Cassell, Petter, Galpin & Co

Callaway, E. (2016), ‘Open-access journal gets £25-million boost’, Nature, 534, 14–15

Fanelli, D. (2010), ‘Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US States Data’, PLoS ONE, 5, e10271

Foster, J. G., A. Rzhetsky and J. A. Evans (2015), ‘Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies’, American Sociology Review, 80, 875–908

Hampton, P. (2015), Pressure to ‘publish or perish’ may discourage innovative research, UCLA study suggests, accessed 1 August 2016

HEFCE (2015a), Monographs and Open Access,,and,open,access/2014_monographs.pdf accessed September 26

HEFCE (2015b), The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management,,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/The,Metric,Tide/2015_metric_tide.pdf accessed September 26

Horton, R. (2015), ‘Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?’, Lancet, 385, 9976, 1380

Kaiser, J. (2015), Q&A Outgoing HHMI chief reflects on leading $19 billion biomedical charity, accessed 1 August 2016

Kravitz, D. J. and C. I. Baker (2011), ‘Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal, Frontiers Computational Neuroscience, 5, 55

Matosin, N., E. Frank, M. Engel, Sl. L. Lum and K. A. Newell (2014), ‘Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture’, Disease Models & Mechanisms, 7, 171–173

Nature Editorial (2012), ‘Must try harder’, Nature, 483, 509

Nielsen, M. (2012), Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Oldenburg, H. (1665), ‘The Introduction’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1, 1–2

Pinfield, S., J. Salter and P. A. Bath (2016), ‘The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 1751–1766

Robertson, M. (2009), ‘Ockham’s broom: A new series’, Journal of Biology, 8, 79

Scargle, J. D. (1999), Publication Bias (The “File-Drawer Problem”) in Scientific Inference, arXiv:physics/9909033

Schekman, R. (2013), ‘How journals like Naure, Cell and Science are ruining science’, The Guardian, 9 December 2013, accessed 1 August 2016

Suber, P. (2012), Open Access, Cambridge: The MIT Press, also available at accessed 26 September 2016

The Netherlands EU Presidency (2016), Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science, accessed 1 August 2016

The Royal Society (2012), Science as an open enterprise, accessed 26 September 2016

Cover of book






Critical Reflections