Critical Reflections on Universities, Publishing, and the Early Career Experience

Authors

  • Jonathan Vickery Centre for Cultural and Media Policy Studies, School of Creative Arts, Performance and Visual Cultures (SCAPVC), University of Warwick, Coventry, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-6536

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v11i2.1583

Keywords:

university publishing, new university presses (NUPs), research journals, interdisciplinarity, young researchers

Abstract

This paper is a critical reflection on the changing relationship between university institutions, academic publishing, and young researchers. It emerges from a current project in assessing the role and development of Warwick University’s research journals (and their editors), but also takes into account two recent Warwick Institute of Advanced Study seminars discussing the practical and strategic challenge of publishing for early career scholars and PhD students. While these seminars concerned publishing in general, and the question of career trajectories, this reflection paper takes into account the current shifts in publishing and our understanding of research as knowledge production more broadly. This reflection maintains that, in part provoked by digital media, the status of research knowledge vis-à-vis its traditional presentation in the discrete products of the ‘article’, and the book, has become unstable, and this instability has opened up a range of economic and systemic conditions of knowledge production that have long since been concealed. Current shifts thus offer younger scholars and early career researchers significant opportunities: this short paper sets out the initial framework for a current research project focussing on university publishing, then it refers to the two above seminars in order to conclude with some critical issues for academic practice, research and for early career scholars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
A row of books of journals in an academic library

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

Issue

Section

Critical Reflections