Modelling Social Mobilisation – An interdisciplinary exploration of Twitter as a mediating tool for social acts and information networks


  • James D Amor Institute of Digital Healthcare, University of Warwick
  • Jonathan Foss Department of Computer Science / Institute of Advanced Study, University of Warwick
  • George Gkotsis Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick
  • Hannah Grainger-Clemson Institute of Advanced Study, University of Warwick
  • Elena Marchis Department of Classics and Ancient History, University of Warwick
  • Faisal Azhar School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Warwick
  • James Amor University of Warwick
  • Jonathan Foss University of Warwick
  • George Gkotsis University of Warwick
  • Hannah Grainger Clemson University of Warwick
  • Elena Marchis University of Warwick
  • Faisal Azhar University of Warwick



In recent years, researchers, social commentators and the mass media have turned their attention to shifts in the use of social media for political and social action. This article provides an overview of the recent discussions focusing on how Twitter specifically functions as a mediating tool for social acts. We present findings from a recent pilot project exploring the mechanics of disseminating information via Twitter across a dynamic human network in order to contribute to an understanding of how people use social media to share information and prompt others into action, and outline some approaches for performing this analysis. Taking the perspective of communities of users operating in hybrid spaces, we make recommendations for further research in this field.

Key words: Twitter, hybrid spaces, social networks, social acts, information flow


Download data is not yet available.


Ahlqvist, T., Bäck, A., Halonen, M. & Heinonen, S. (2008) Social Media Roadmaps: Exploring the futures triggered by social media, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Accessed online 30/4/2013 at

Ahn, Y., Bagrow, J., and Lehmann, S. (2010) Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466 (05 August 2010), pp.761-764

Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media

Baym, N (2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press

Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell

Cattuto C, Loreto V, Pietronero L (2007) Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jan 30;104(5):1461-4. Epub 2007 Jan 23

Charles, A. (2012) Interactivity: New media, politics and society, Oxford: Peter Lang

Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Lan, X., and Suri, S. (2010) Sequential Influence Models in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010, ICWSM 2010, Washington, DC, USA, May 23-26, 2010, The AAAI Press.

de Souza e Silva, A. & Delacruz, G. (2006) Hybrid Reality Games Reframed: Potential Uses in Educational Contexts, Games and Culture 1(3) pp. 231-251.

Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Cambridge: CUP

Eckmann, J-P. & Moses, E. (2002) Curvature of co-links uncovers hidden thematic layers in the world wide web. PNAS, 99(9):5825–5829, April 2002.

Gillen, J. & Merchant, G. (2013) Contact calls: Twitter as a dialogic, social, and linguistic practice, Language Sciences, Vol 35, pp.47-58

Herwig, J. (2009) Liminality and Communitas in Social Media: The Case of Twitter. Accessed 28/2/13 at

Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays by Martin Heidegger, London: Harper & Row Publishers

Jurgenson, N. (2011) When Atoms Meet Bits: Social Media, the Mobile Web and Augmented Revolution, Future Internet, 4(1), 83-91

Kluitenberg, E. (2006) The Network of Wave: Living and Acting in a Hybrid Space, Open Vol. 11, SKOR – Foundation for Art and Public Domain. Accessed online at, 28/2/13

Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., & Moore, J. (2011) Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the OMG, in Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved March 31, 2013,

Lambiotte, R., Saramaki, J., and Blondel, V.D. (2009) Dynamics of latent voters. Physical Review E, 79(4):046107, 6 pages.

Manovich, L. Lev (2002) The Poetics of Augmented Space: Learning from Prada), Accessed online 31/3/13

Minsky, M. (1980) Telepresence, Omni, June 1980

Murthy, D. (2013) Twitter: Social communication in the Twitter Age, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press

Romero, D., Meeder, B., Kleinberg, J. (2011) Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter, Proceedings of WWW’11 – the 20th international conference on World Wide Web, pp695-704 Accessed 31/3/13 at

Sturken, M. & Thomas, D. (2004) Introduction: technological visions and the rhetoric of the new. In M. Sturken, D. Thomas & S. Ball-Rokeach (eds.) Technological Visions: The Hopes and Fears that Shape New Technologies, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press

Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E. (2010) Want to be Retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting Retweet in Titter Network, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (Social Com), pp177-184

Tang, J.. Musolesi, M., Mascolo, C., Latora, V. ; Nicosia, V., (2010) Analysing Information Flows and Key Mediators through Temporal Centrality Metrics, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Systems (SNS'10), ACM Press - Association for Computing Machinery, pp1-6

Wellman and Berkowitz (eds.) (1988) Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Zhao, H., Lin, W., Liu, K. (2011) Behavior Dynamics in Media-Sharing Social Networks, Cambridge: CUP

Computer screen showing Twitter