Fiona, Phyllida and the ‘F’-Word: the theatrical practice(s) of women playing the male roles in Shakespeare
Keywords:Shakespeare, Theatre, Women, Cross-gender, Feminism, Reception
This article discusses the theatrical practice of women performing traditionally male roles in Shakespeare. Whilst historically the phenomenon is nothing new, since the 1970s the practice has been particularly associated with the politics of feminism. This article proposes to examine this connection in order to explore how far the convention of casting women in the male roles of Shakespeare has been influenced by changing social, political, and cultural discourses. It will do so by considering two specific manifestations of the theatrical practice: firstly, the National Theatre’s 1995/6 Richard II directed by Deborah Warner, in which Fiona Shaw played the eponymous male character and secondly the 2012/13 all-female Julius Caesar, directed by Phyllida Lloyd for the Donmar Warehouse. Moreover, it will locate these two productions, separated by seventeen years and the turn of a century, within their specific historical, theatrical, and theoretical contexts. Through an analysis of the material conditions that gave rise to the contemporary receptions of these two productions, the objective of this article is to draw conclusions concerning the differing ways in which, through casting women in the male roles of Shakespeare, theatre practitioners have created particular theatrical conversations with their audiences.
Armistead, C. (1995) ‘Kingdom Under Siege’, The Guardian, 31 May 1995, Guardian Features Section
Balme, C. B. (2008) The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bennett, S. (1997) Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd ed.,London and New York: Routledge
Billington, M. (1997) ‘The Fuel in the Crown’, Guardian, 5 June 1995
Billington, M. (2012) ‘Review of Julius Caesar at Donmar Warehouse: Female Prisoners’ liberating vision,’ The Guardian, 5 December 2012
Bulman, J. C. (2008) ‘Introduction’ in Bulman, J. C. (ed), Shakespeare Re-dressed: Cross-gender Casting in Contemporary Performance, Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 11-20
Clapp, S. (2013), ‘Friends, Romans, Countrywomen … An all-female Julius Caesar twists the knife with urgency and conviction: Julius Caesar at the Donmar Warehouse’, The Observer, 9 December 2012
Cousin, G. (1996), ‘Exploring Space at Play: the Making of the Theatrical Event’, NewTheatre Quarterly, (12), pp. 229–236
Freestone, E. (2011),‘The Legacy of Shakespeare’s Ratio: Changing the 2:1,’ unpublished research document, The National Theatre of Great Britain
Gardner, L. (2014), ‘Review – Theatre: Pop and Prostitutes as the F-Word storms the stage: Blurred Lines, The Shed’, The Guardian, 23 January 2014
Gompetz, W. (2012), Interview with Phyllida Lloyd, The Today Programme, BBC Radio Four, 6 December, 2012
Higgins, C. (2012) ‘Cry Havoc: Can an all-women Julius Caesar work?’, The Guardian, 19 November 2012, G2 Section
Higgins, C. (2012) ’Exit the women stage left: Women in theatre: why do so few make it to the top?’ The Guardian,10 December 2012, G2 Section
Hitchings, H. (2012), ‘All Hail to all-female Caesar with a twist of Cell Block H’, Evening Standard, 5 December 2012
Howard, A. (2007) Women as Hamlet: Performance and Interpretation in Theatre, Film and Fiction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Iyengar, S. (2006) ‘Colorblind Casting in Single-Sex Shakespeare’, Colorblind Shakespeare: New Perspectives on Race and Performance, Thompson A. (ed), New York and London: Routledge, p. 47–68
Klett, E. (2009), Cross-Gender Shakespeare and English National Identity: Wearing the Codpiece, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Koenig, R. (1995) ‘Review of Richard II’ The Independent, 5 June 1995, p.10
Monks, A. (2007) ‘Predicting the Past: Histories and Futures in the Work of Women Directors’, Aston E. and G Harris (eds), Feminist Futures?, 2nd edn, Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan,: pp. 88–104
Purves, L. (2012) ‘Review: Julius Caesar at the Donmar’, The Times, 5 December 2012
Russell, A. (1996) ‘Tragedy, Gender, Performance: Women as Tragic Heroes on the Nineteenth Century Stage’, Comparative Drama 30, pp.135–157
Rutter, C. (1997) ‘Fiona Shaw’s Richard II: The Girl as Player-King as Comic’, Shakespeare Quarterly 48, pp. 314–324
Rutter, C. (2010) ‘Deborah Warner’ Russell Brown J. (ed), The Routledge Companion to Director’s Shakespeare, 2nd edn, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 474–492
Spencer, C. (2012), ‘Cast of women put Caesar to the sword’, Daily Telegraph, 5 December 2012
Sutcliffe, T. (2012) ‘Saturday Review’, Radio 4, 8 December 2012
Taylor, P. (1995) ‘Second Opinion’, The Independent, 14 June 1995, Theatre Section
Temple, A. (1995) ‘To Play the King (and be a Women)’, The Independent on Sunday, 21 May 1995, Review Section
The Independent, 'The Directors. No 5: Deborah Warner: a weekly guide to British theatre’s big players’, 19 July 1995, Theatre Section
Tinker, J. (1995) ‘Fiona’s King is a Drag’, Daily Mail, 16 June 1995
Thompson, A. (2006) ‘Practising a Theory/Theorizing a Practice’, in Colorblind Shakespeare: New Perspectives on Race and Performance, Thompson A. (ed), New York and London: Routledge
Truman, M. (2012) ‘Shakespeare’s sisters force their way into the Bard’s boys’ club’, The Independent, 17 November 2012, Arts and Books Review Section
Woddis, C. (1995) ‘Review of Richard II’, Glasgow Herald, 6 June 1995
http://www.Propeller.org.uk accessed 15 February 2014.
http://www.royalexchange.co.uk/ accessed 22 February 2014.
http://www.shakespearesgobe.com accessed 15 February 2014.
http://www.theshed.nationaltheatre.org.uk accessed 14 February 2014
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits use and redistribution of the work provided that the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is included, and an indication of changes which were made. Third-party users may not apply legal terms or technological measures to the published article which legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
If accepted for publication authors’ work will be made open access and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license unless previously agreed with Exchanges’ Editor-in-Chief prior to submission.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (see: The Effect of Open Access)