The ‘Biological Turn’ in History Writing
In recent history writing, there has been an acceleration of interdisciplinary projects drawing from the life sciences, a movement which has been identified as a ‘biological turn’, taking perspectives from diverse fields such as biology, evolutionary psychology, and neurobiology to provide insights into traditional written sources. While this provides numerous new understandings, current use of the life sciences is often uncritical. I argue that the biological turn in history writing uses the sciences not to create challenging insights, but to make naturalised claims of human behaviour, and carries with it the current epistemological and socio-political preferences for economically and politically ‘useful’ scientific knowledge. Yet the claims of the biological turn are proposed as divorced from any political context. This is at best naïve, and delegitimises alternative sources of knowledge production. Such an approach has serious implications for writing history, undermines the programme of the history of science, and should be challenged in order to assist in the creation of more helpful and introspective knowledge when engaging with interdisciplinary material. In this review article I argue that the biological turn is an unsatisfactory response to the linguistic turn, and discuss the political and institutional implications of the current uncritical usage of the life sciences in history writing.
Casper, Stephen T. (2014), ‘History and Neuroscience: An Integrative Legacy’, Isis, 105 (1), 123-32
Cooter, Roger (2014), ‘Neural Veils and the Will to Historical Critique: Why Historians of Science Need to Take the Neuro-Turn Seriously’, Isis, 105 (1), 145-54
Dunbar, Robin (2014), A Pelican Introduction: Human Evolution, London: Pelican Books
Feynman, Richard P. (1989), ‘What do you care what other people think?’: further adventures of a curious character, London: Unwin Hyman
Foucault, Michel (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London: Tavistock Publications
Fukuyama, Francis (2002), Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, New York: Picador
Gould, Stephen Jay (1996), The Mismeasure of Man, London: Penguin Books
Hamilton, Richard (2008), ‘The Darwinian cage: Evolutionary psychology as moral science’, Theory, Culture & Society 25 (2), 105-26
Harris, Sam (2010), The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, London: Free Press
Hunt, Lynn (2014), 'The Self and Its History', American Historical Review 119 (5), 1576-86
Ignatieff, Michael (1999), 'Asecent of Man', Prospect, 45 (10), https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/michael-ignatieff-the-enlightenment, accessed 22 April 2017
Ioannidis, John P. A. (2005), ‘Why Most Published Research Findings are False’, PLoS Medicine 8 (2), http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124, accessed 22 April 2017
Knapton, Sarah (2015), ‘Britain 'is experiencing same decline as Rome in 100BC', The Telegraph, 26 April 2015, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11562374/Britain-is-experiencing-same-decline-as-Rome-in-100BC.html#disqus_thread, accessed 17 April 2016
Law, John (2007), 'Making a Mess with Method', in Outhwaite, William and Turner, Stephen P. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology, London: SAGE, pp. 595-606
Lilienfeld, Scott O. , Katheryn C. Sauvigné, Steven Jay Lynn, Robin L. Cautin, Robert D. Latzman and Irwin D. Waldman (2015), 'Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: a list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases', Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (1), http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100/full, accessed 15 April 2016
Malik, Kenan (2000), Natural Science http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/natural.html, accessed 14 April 2016
Malik, Kenan (2006), ‘What science can and cannot tell us about human nature’, in Robin Headlam Wells, Johnjoe McFadden (eds.), Human Nature: Fact and Fiction, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 164-83
Massumi, Brian (2002), Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press
Meloni, Maurizio (2016), Political Biology and the Politics of Epistemology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Penman, Jim (2015a), Biohistory Explained. https://www.biohistory.org/biohistory-explained/, accessed 22 April 2017
Penman, Jim (2015), Biohistory, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Penman, Jim (2015c), The Research. http://www.biohistory.org/the-research, accessed 17 April 2016
Pinker, Steven (1997), How the Mind Works, New York: W. W. Norton
Renfrew, Colin (2012), ‘Bridging the Millenia, review of Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present’, American Scientist, 100 (1), http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/bridging-the-millennia, accessed 15 April 2016
Ridley, Matt (1997), The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Penguin.
Rorty, Richard (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Blackwell
Rose, Hillary, and Stephen Rose (2016), Can Neuroscience change our minds?, Cambridge: Polity
Satel, Sally, and Scott Lilienfeld (2013), Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience, New York: Basic Books
Sheehan, Paul (2004), 'Postmodernism and philosophy' in Steven Conner (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shyrock, Andrew, and Daniel Lord Smail (2011), Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present, Berkeley: University of California Press
Smail, Daniel Lord (2008), On Deep History and the Brain, Berkeley: University of California Press
Stafford, Barbara (2007), Echo Objects: The Cognitive Work of Images, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
Tallis, Raymond (2011), Aping Mankind, Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity, Durham: Acumen
Thornhill, Randy and Craig Palmer (2000), Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion, Massachusetts: MIT Press
Toews, John (1987), ‘Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience’, American Historical Review, 92 (4), 879-907
Whitehouse, Peter J. (2012), ‘A Clinical Neuroscientist Looks Neuroskeptically at Neuroethics in the Neuroworld’ in Melissa M. Littlefield, and Jennell M Johnson (eds.), The Neurosceintific Turn: Transcisiplinarity in the Age of the Brain, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 199-215
Wilson, E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Wright, Robert (1996), The moral animal : evolutionary psychology and everyday life, London, Abacus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, providing it is not used for commercial purposes and any derivative work is shared with the same license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).