School drama group

Talking drama into being: types of talk in drama classrooms

Kelly Freebody

Abstract


This paper explores the structure of talk in drama classrooms, particularly the ways students and teachers use different kinds of talk to achieve their classroom work and construct shared moral reasoning as the basis of their practical educational activities. The data and discussion presented here bring together the curricular setting of educational drama and the methodological setting of Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorisation Analysis. The transcripts and analyses emerged from a larger study that sought to explore the particular ways students interacted within process drama lessons dealing with future life prospects and pathways.  The identification of three distinct kinds of talk has significance for education scholars, teacher-educators and teacher-practitioners as it has the potential to enable a more detailed awareness of the structure of classroom practice and the particular ways students engage with significant ideas in classroom settings. 


Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Austin, H., Dwyer, B. & Freebody, P., 2003. Schooling the child: The making of students in classrooms. London: Routledge-Falmer.

Boal, A., 1979. Theatre of the oppressed. London: Pluto Press.

Bolton, G., 1998. Acting in Classroom Drama. Staffordshire: Trentham Books.

Bowell, P & Heap, B., 2001. Planning Process Drama. London: David Fulton Publishers.

Drew, P. & Heritage, J., 1992. Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage, eds. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 3-65.

Eglin, P. & Hester, S., 1992. Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action. Semiotica, 88, p. 243–68.

Freiberg, J. & Freebody, P., 1995. Analysing literacy events in classrooms and homes: Conversation-analytic approaches. In P. Freebody, C. Ludwig, & S. Gunn, Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socioeconomic urban communities. Report to the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation, p. 185-372.

Heap, J. L., 1990. Applied Ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies, 13 p, 36-72.

Healthcote, D. & Herbert, P., 1985. A drama of learning: Mantle of the expert. Theory into practice, 24(3), p. 173-180.

Heritage, J., 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R., 1998. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jayyusi, L., 1984. Categorisation and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Kao, S. & O’Neill, C., 1998. Words into worlds: learning a second language through process drama. Ablex publishing Corporation, Stanford.

Lee, Yo-An (2004) 'The work of examples in classroom instruction', Linguistics and Education 15: 99-120

Lee, Yo-An (2007) 'Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching', Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (6): 1204-1230

Macbeth, D., 2000. Classrooms as instillations: Direct instruction in the early grades. In S. Hester & D. Francis, eds. Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 21-72.

Macbeth, D., 1996. The discovery of situated worlds: Analytic commitments or moral orders? Human studies, 19, p, 267-87.

Mehan, H., 1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. van Dijk, ed. Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic, p. 119-131.

O’Neill, C. 1995. Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

O’Toole, J., 1992. The process of drama: Negotiating art and meaning. London: Routledge.

Sacks, H., 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, H. Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, p. 696–735.

Schegloff, E., 2007. Sequence organisation in conversation A primer in conversation analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M., 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, P. & Warner C. D., 2006. Structure and Spontaneity: The process drama of Cecily O’Neill. Stoke on Kent: Trentham.

ten Have, P., 1999. Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.

Wagner, B.J., 1979. Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium. London: Hutchinson and Co Ltd.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Exchanges: the Warwick Research Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.