A Political Ecology of ‘Adaptation’
Critical perspectives on case studies in Taiwan and Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v13i1.1718Keywords:
political ecology, adaptation, Taiwan, Vietnam, Indigenous Peoples, climate crisis, Anthropocene, smallholder farmingAbstract
The current global climate crisis, a result of the Anthropocene, has forced the global community to reconsider current notions of adaptation, vulnerability and resilience. This has especially been true for smallholder local and Indigenous farmers, who on the one hand have proven to be excellent at adapting to changing environmental conditions but on the other hand are also disproportionally affected by the global climate crisis. In this article, I will critically examine the concept of adaptation from a political ecology perspective, both conceptually and using examples from Taiwan and Vietnam. I argue that ‘adaptation’, as we know it, is often a neoliberal mechanism which puts the responsibility on individual farmers, instead of looking at the many structural barriers and power relations underlying unequal vulnerabilities and resiliencies. Instead of seeing adaptation, resilience and vulnerabilities as linear and causal processes, it would be better to reconsider these definitions from a critical perspective. On the one hand, we do need to prepare for the adverse effects of climate change, but on the other hand we need to be aware of what causes structural inequalities to co-exist. This awareness will then hopefully lead to better bottom-up strategies towards coping with the global climate crisis from smallholders’ perspectives, while tackling other inequalities and unequal power structures at the same time.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits use and redistribution of the work provided that the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is included, and an indication of changes which were made. Third-party users may not apply legal terms or technological measures to the published article which legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
If accepted for publication authors’ work will be made open access and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license unless previously agreed with Exchanges’ Editor-in-Chief prior to submission.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (see: The Effect of Open Access)