Re-imagining the Anthropocene by Examining Sustainability Culture Through the Lens of Paradox
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v13i1.2211Keywords:
sustainability, Anthropocene, sustainability culture, Two Truths Doctrine, logic, lifeworldAbstract
In this Critical Reflection I seek to re-imagine the Anthropocene and its ecological crisis though a change of basic narrative from logic to paradox. Based on the proposition that the concept of culture plays a crucial role in understanding the sustainability crisis, I propose that the narrativization of the meaning of culture, as it plays its role in sustainability, may need to be changed in order to better serve the purpose of understanding our experienced Anthropocenic life situation. After discussing how the perspective of traditional logic is failing us in this quest, I examine the ideas of paradoxical lifeworlding and the Buddhist philosophical construct of the Two Truths Doctrine. I argue that the concept of living in the space between two paradoxical truths may form a better way of imagining how and why we can create a belief system that allows us to live and work sustainably. Finally, I discuss humankind’s next sustainability challenge.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Theodoor A.M. Richard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits use and redistribution of the work provided that the original author and source are credited, a link to the license is included, and an indication of changes which were made. Third-party users may not apply legal terms or technological measures to the published article which legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
If accepted for publication authors’ work will be made open access and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license unless previously agreed with Exchanges’ Editor-in-Chief prior to submission.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (see: The Effect of Open Access)